Tax Planning for Retirees

Transfers to Roth IRAs: Part 2

Special Deferral of Tax on Rollovers to Roth IRAs in 2010. – For a “taxable qualified rollover contribution” (TQR contribution) to a Roth IRA in 2010, one-half the income generally is not taxable until 2011, and the other half generally not taxable until 2012 (unless the retiree elects to report it all in 2010). However, if the retiree dies or takes a distribution of any of the transferred funds before 2012, the retiree must accelerate payment of the deferred tax on the distributed funds. Nevertheless, a surviving spouse who is the sole beneficiary of the Roth account may elect to continue the deferral into his or her own tax returns. (Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-455, § 512; I.R.C. § 408A.) See Chapter 6 of the treatise.

MyRAs: A New Type of Roth IRA. – Roth IRAs now include myRAs. A myRA is a type of account administered for a participant by the U.S. government The account is funded with payroll deductions remitted by employers. The federal government invests the remitted funds in U.S savings bonds paying a variable rate of interest. Accumulations in a myRA are limited to the lesser of $15,000 or 30 years of accumulations. The tax treatment of myRAs is the same as the tax treatment of other Roth IRAs. (White House Fact Sheet: Opportunity for All: Securing a Dignified Retirement for All Americans (Jan. 30, 2014).) See Chapter 6 of the treatise.

Using Multiple Rollovers to Make Tax-Free Roth IRA Contributions. – A retiree may combine a trustee-to-trustee rollover to a traditional IRA with a trustee-to-trustee rollover to a Roth IRA, all from a single qualified plan distribution. In fact, the retiree can make the rollovers totally tax-free by (1) limiting the Roth IRA rollover to an amount equal to the recovery of investment in the distribution and (2) allocating all the investment to the Roth IRA rollover. The direct rollover of the distributed pre-tax earnings to the traditional IRA is also tax-free. (Notice 2014-54, 2014-41 I.R.B. 670.) See Chapter 6 of the treatise.

Penalties Imposed for Artificially Shifting Value from Business Entities to Roth IRAs. – In 2004, the IRS announced that it would closely scrutinize transactions involving a Roth IRA and other entities related to the owner of the Roth IRA. The IRS was concerned that the owner of a Roth IRA might attempt to circumvent contribution limits by artificially shifting value to the Roth IRA. Since then, the IRS has had mixed results in challenging arrangements designed to shift value to Roth IRAs.

In one case, taxpayers formed two C corporations that were 98 percent owned by the taxpayers’ Roth IRAs. The taxpayers claimed to have formed the new corporations to provide services for a pre-existing S corporation owned by the taxpayers. However, the Tax Court found that actual services provided to the S corporation, if any, were woefully insufficient to justify the amounts paid for them. The court concluded that the entire arrangement was without substance and treated the service payments as dividends to the taxpayers. It held that the taxpayers had then effectively used the dividends to make Roth IRA contributions that were subject to the excise tax on excess contributions.

In a more recent case, taxpayers’ Roth IRAs owned all the stock of a holding corporation that in turn owned all the stock of a domestic international sales corporation (DISC). Another corporation owned by the taxpayers paid commissions to the DISC on the corporation’s international sales of industrial products. The DISC immediately distributed the amount of commission payments to the holding corporation, which then immediately distributed the after-tax amounts to the Roth IRAs.

The Tax Court held that the arrangement was without substance and treated the commission payments as dividends to the taxpayers that the taxpayers used to make excess contributions to Roth IRAs. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit reversed, stating that Congress had expressly authorized the use of DISCs for tax avoidance purposes and had expressly authorized the ownership of DISCs by tax-exempt entities such as Roth IRAs. (Summa Holding, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-119, rev’d, 2017-1 U.S.T.C. ¶50,155 (6th Cir. 2017); Repetto v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-168; Notice 2004-8, 2004-1 C.B. 333.) See Chapter 6 of the treatise.